Showing posts with label professional services. Show all posts
Showing posts with label professional services. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Sooner Rather Than Later… Please!



August 16, 2016

Sooner Rather Than Later… Please!

In the past few weeks, we’ve received a higher than average number of requests for digital forensic services on very short notice.  To some digital forensic practitioners, particularly in the public sector, this may seem almost unheard of, but when I say short notice, I mean short notice!  For example, an attorney called on a Friday afternoon from out-of-state and wanted a mobile forensic extraction and analysis done on a serious felony case set for trial the following Wednesday.  Without the weekend, that would have given us 2 working days to obtain the evidence, analyze the evidence and somehow put forth a set of conclusions suitable for a high-level trial.  To aggravate the circumstances, the case also involved analyzing the search warrant return from an internet service provider and incorporating that into the overall case.  In another serious case, counsel wanted call detail records and tower records analyzed, mapped and concluded for trial in just a few days.

The purpose of this article is not to whine or chide, rather to illustrate to all of the potential stakeholders in the legal system and corporations who may have need to for adequate, competent and professional expertise in the field of digital forensics why it is important to call us sooner rather than later.  Pretty please.

Reason #1: Thoroughness

Being thorough normally manifests itself in one of the following ways:  Either you are trained to be thorough or you have thoroughness in your genes.  Me, I’ve had to work rather hard at being thorough and in particular, knowing how thoroughness plays into all of the cases we work.  In digital forensics, thoroughness is extremely important.  It is important that your examiner know where to look for potential evidence, where potential evidence may be hiding, clues that may lead to the discovery of hidden evidence and what all of that means when put together in the larger investigation.  More often than not, thorough examinations also involve multiple levels of analysis using a variety of tools to adhere to the “holistic” approach.  Depending on the scope of the case, this process can take a lot of time.  The last thing you need, as an attorney, corporate security manager or a CEO, is a rush job.  The bottom line is, lives are depending on it.  Whether the case involves someone’s employment status, a potential divorce or custody issue or a defendant’s ultimate freedom, it matters.  And if it matters, its worth taking the time to be thorough and utilizing an examiner that is thorough.



Reason #2: No Examiner is an Island

Current status: Solo practitioner.  This means that I rely heavily on training, expertise, reference material and instinct.  These resources not only provide a more focused view of the cases Pro Digital works, but also serve to build upon a base of knowledge so each case is (hopefully) better than the last.  When I really need to bounce an idea off someone who is generally more knowledgeable and experienced, I call upon one or more colleagues for their advice.  However, because it is in the Pro Digital Mission Statement (as well as my personal belief), every effort is made to research, learn and grow as a digital forensic resource for our clients.  This time is not billed.  It does take time, though.  Every case is different, so every case requires different amounts of resources in order for the final product to be acceptable and defensible.

Recently, opposing counsel in a civil case put forth digital forensic conclusions from their expert which were not supported by evidence or fact in the declaration.  This means that our rebuttal is based upon their conclusions, which are incomplete at best.  It also necessitated posing questions of the opposing expert for clarification, which naturally extended the court-imposed deadline.  Could we have rendered some opinion based on what was presented?  Yes.  But the opinion would have been full of qualifying statements and holes that can only be filled by taking the time to do the examination.  Please remember, we cannot do what you want us to do with incomplete or partial information.  It invites opposing parties to poke holes in our conclusions, which is embarrassing and ultimately not helpful in your case.



Reason #3: You Want the Best We Can Give

I put forth a question to attorneys of all areas of practice who may read this article:  Would you represent a client in a serious civil, administrative or criminal matter where the client brought the case to you a week or less before trial?  Of course not.  By the same token, you don’t want a digital forensic expert to take on a case with little or no time to be as thorough as possible and render conclusions that may very well affect the outcome of your case.  Often, getting the data and/or disk image is a simple matter, so we can work to get that done in a timely manner, but the devil is in the details and in digital forensics, the details are in the analysis. 

We prioritize cases likely the same way – court-imposed deadlines are prioritized by date and others are taken in-turn.  If there is an employment matter that is time-sensitive, we will work to get those completed as soon as possible, but to reiterate, we strive in every case to be thorough and render conclusions based upon the analysis and examination of evidence.  It is my constant hope that all colleagues who conduct digital forensic analysis do the same.  Therefore, we all need the time to do the proper analysis, attempt to locate the relevant evidence, consult with you and/or the client and button-up our findings as best we can.  We all owe that to the client/company/defendant/plaintiff in the pursuit of justice.

Wrapping it up

So what’s the point of all of this?  Please give your digital forensic examiner/resource the time they need to help you and your case to the best of their ability.  We don’t want to turn the work away for a multitude of reasons and we’ll help you out any way we can, but please allow us the time to do that.   Some of the best cases we’ve worked have incorporated several key elements:   Plenty of notice, excellent coordination/communication and effective security of the evidence once the relevant evidence items are identified.  By putting those three elements together, you maximize the effectiveness of your digital forensic resource as well as the value they can add to your case!


Author:
Patrick J. Siewert
Principal Consultant
Professional Digital Forensic Consulting, LLC
Virginia DCJS #11-14869
Based in Richmond, Virginia
Available Globally


We Find the Truth for a Living!
Computer Forensics -- Mobile Forensics -- Specialized Investigation

About the Author:
Patrick Siewert is the Principal Consultant of Pro Digital Forensic Consulting, based in Richmond, Virginia.  In 15 years of law enforcement, he investigated hundreds of high-tech crimes, incorporating digital forensics into the investigations, and was responsible for investigating some of the highest jury and plea bargain child exploitation investigations in Virginia court history.  A graduate of SCERS, BCERT, the Reid School of Interview & Interrogation and multiple online investigation schools (among others), Siewert continues to hone his digital forensic expertise in the private sector while growing his consulting & investigation business marketed toward litigators, professional investigators and corporations.
Twitter: @ProDigital4n6

Wednesday, December 2, 2015

The Value of Expert Witness-Attorney Relationships



December 2, 2015

The Value of Expert Witness-Attorney Relationships

The term “expert witness” may get tossed around a little more than it should.  Since leaving law enforcement, I can attest to the fact that I’ve seen so-called “experts” of all shapes and sizes.  Some are very professional and knowledgeable and some just want to call themselves an “expert” in something to boost their resume (and no doubt their billing rate).   

But experts are not restricted to the private sector.  Indeed, my first designations as an expert were through repeated work and testimony involved in law enforcement and criminal investigations.  While the procedure of qualifying an expert through appropriate questioning, voir dire and thorough documentation has been written about extensively and ruled on by the courts, what is less often brought to light is the importance of the relationship between the expert witness and the attorney(s) involved in the case. 

There are good experts and bad experts, just like there are good attorneys and bad attorneys.  I’ve worked with both kinds.  This isn’t an insult to anyone in the legal profession, it’s just a simple fact.  In any discipline you will find people who are professional, competent, prepared and educated and those who are not.  In my experience, the attorneys who take the time to thoroughly prepare for trial by extensive interviewing of the client, the expert, any and all witnesses and careful review of the evidence and how it relates to the law are by far the best to work with.  Sadly, this is the exception rather than the norm.  



Working with a competent, professional attorney can make the expert’s job much more effective and serve the client more fully.  And when the case is concluded, that’s really what we all want – for the client (whether the client is society or an individual) to be well-served by our efforts.  We can’t dictate the outcome, we can only strive to put forth the best case possible and hope the outcome reflects the truth.  So what should an effective expert-attorney relationship look like?  Here’s a few things I’ve learned so far:

1)      Thoroughly research your expert witnesses and interview them before engaging their services.  Factors that should be considered include: do they have experience testifying in jury trials, do they have appropriate credentials for the job, do they have the requisite knowledge, skills & abilities and can they articulate what may be very technical testimony in terms a lay-person can understand.  If the answer is no to any of these, it may be a clue to keep shopping… even if it costs more.

2)      Constant communication with experts is vital.  Waiting until a day or two before trial to reach out to your expert to solidify their findings and testimony is not acceptable.  This rings especially true for attorneys in the public sector (prosecutors) when their expert is a law enforcement investigator.

3)      Educate yourself about the expert’s findings and testimony.  Do you know the difference between SMS, MMS and iMessage text messages?  Do you know why certain information cannot be obtained from Apple devices vs. Android devices?  Do you know what types of information is retrievable and what is not from the unallocated space of a hard drive?  While your expert is the actual SME on these topics, questioning them at trial or deposition with a decent background of knowledge will help the testimony go smoother and help the finder of fact understand things better.  It will also show opposing counsel that you know what you’re talking about.  You’ll find most experts are happy to help educate you and the more educated you are about specific topics that may present themselves in legal matters, the more effective you’ll be over time.

4)      Review your expert’s testimony before trial or deposition.  I know this may seem a “no-brainer” to most litigators, but speaking from the other side of the witness stand, I can honestly say that about 65% of the attorneys I’ve worked with in the past have actually done this.  It’s a horrible feeling for your expert to take the stand and not have any idea what you’re going to ask, so please do the expert and the client a favor and review these things before court.



Positive, productive relationships between attorneys and experts are not only important, but they’re always a work-in-progress.  I have two very good attorney friends – one prosecutor and one defense attorney – with whom I stay in regular contact, whether we have a case together or not.  It’s not just a quid-pro-quo service-oriented relationship.  It’s a symbiotic relationship based on mutual respect and understanding.  They know I’m the SME when it comes to electronic investigation and digital forensics.  I know I’m not an attorney or a legal expert.  I’ve known these attorneys for years and they both refer me to other attorneys because of this relationship.  Simply put, it’s more than just business.

I’ll wrap this up with a note about the charlatans.  Regular readers of this blog probably know very well my stance on certification vs. experience, but the note about charlatans goes way beyond that.  I was in a professional association meeting earlier this year during which another member extolled the fact that he has a 25-page curriculum vitae and is a qualified “expert” on everything from handwriting analysis to accident reconstruction.  This irritated me because by professing he’s an “expert” in multiple disciplines for which he may not have any formal training, experience or real knowledge, he devalues us all who do.  In my experience, true experts specialize in one or two disciplines and hone their knowledge and skills over time.  Blowhards just want another feather in their cap to increase their billable rate.

Bottom line, it’s up to you to choose an appropriate expert for your case.  Research them, talk to them and fully vet them.  You won’t regret the work on the front-end and the value the right expert can add to your case could very well make the difference between winning and losing.

Author:
Patrick J. Siewert, SCERS, BCERT, LCE
Principal Consultant
Professional Digital Forensic Consulting, LLC
(Virginia DCJS #11-14869)
Based in Richmond, Virginia
Available Globally

We Find the Truth for a Living!

About the Author:
Patrick Siewert is the Principal Consultant of Pro Digital Forensic Consulting, based in Richmond, Virginia.  In 15 years of law enforcement, he investigated hundreds of high-tech crimes, incorporating digital forensics into the investigations, and was responsible for investigating some of the highest jury and plea bargain child exploitation cases in Virginia court history.  A graduate of both SCERS, BCERT, the Reid School of Interview & Interrogation and various online investigation schools (among others), Siewert continues to hone his digital forensic expertise in the private sector while growing his consulting & investigation business marketed toward litigators, professional investigators and corporations.
Twitter: @ProDigital4n6